NONVIOLENT SELF-DEFENSE

Sample Chapter from "Nonviolent Self-Defense"

2008-03-27T18:00:00.000-07:00

Core Skills of Nonviolent Self-Defense

Protecting the Centerline

Scenario One: You are walking down a quiet suburban street enjoying

the warm morning sunshine, when suddenly several loud, percussive

explosions split the tranquil air. Your immediate response is to crouch

down, cover your head with your hands, and retreat several steps away

from the sound of the blasts. Only then do you turn back to find the noise

was caused by a kid lighting off a string of firecrackers.

Scenario Two: You are walking down that same quiet street when a

neighbor’s dog comes bolting off the front porch barking fiercely. In

response, you take an immediate step backwards, turn sideways to

face the snarling mongrel, and bring your hands up to a defensive

position. You then reinforce your ready posture with a few sharp

commands and appropriate epithets.

Both scenarios are good examples of the startle reflex. It initiates

an adrenaline-driven fight or flight response to imminent danger,

and it has helped to protect our species from harm for millions of

years. The defensive movements used to counter the two perceived

perils, on the other hand, are fundamentally different in nature.

In the first scene, the sudden, loud noise provoked a general crouch

and cover defense designed to protect as much of the body as possible

from an unspecified threat.

In the second scene, we began with the same reflexive reaction to

being startled, however, a clear and present danger was immediately

identified and adjusted for. A quick step was taken away from the line

of attack, and a classic defensive posture was assumed facing the

belligerent beast. The key difference in the response was the

identification of, and familiarity with, the direct threat. But a common

thread that runs throughout both scenarios is the instinctive move to

protect the centerline of the body.

This centerline is literally a zone a few inches wide that runs down the

middle of the body from the forehead to the groin. Nearly every body

part that could be seriously harmed, if struck hard enough, is located

either on this line or immediately adjacent. The at-risk organs along

this zone include the brain, eyes, nose, chin, throat, heart, lungs,

internal organs, and, for a man in particular, the genitals. While the latter

is of greater vulnerability for a male, the proximity of the femoral arteries

make the groin a sensitive area for both men and women and one the

body instinctively seeks to protect.

The human body is organized to protect the centerline. Witness the

fetal position of a baby in the uterus. It is not just a space saving posture,

adapting to its ever more cramped quarters as it grows, but also a position

of protection. The fetal position is an instinctive posture taken up by someone

being beaten who cannot, or will not, fight back.

In this protective profile, the hands cover the face or head, the elbows

collapse inward to guard the chest, and the knees draw upward to cover

the abdomen. Practitioners of nonviolent protest, for example, are trained

to take up this position when confronted with hostile crowds or truncheon-

wielding police. The body will reflexively sacrifice the outer extremities

to protect vital central organs. While being struck on the limbs can be painful

or debilitating to an arm or leg fending off a blow, being struck on the centerline

may prove extremely damaging or even terminal in its consequences.

All martial arts systems are organized along the principle tenet of either

attacking or defending the centerline. The “hard" systems, like karate, seek

to condition and root the center line and then use the arms and legs, toughened

by hours of repeated practice, to block a blow. While the arms and legs pay a

price, the centerline is spared the worst of it. In the “soft" systems, like Tai Chi

or Aikido, movement and a pliant body are emphasized in order to get the

centerline out of the way. If the centerline is struck, it is at least moving in the

same direction as the impact, thereby dissipating the worst effects of the blow

Of crucial importance in understanding how to react to the force of a blow are
three possible movement responses:

1) Moving into force

2) Standing still

3) Moving away from force.

With only a few exceptions, which we will discuss later, this list of responses goes
from worst to best.

1) Moving Into Force

If you move toward an incoming attack, the force of your own body moves

with you. As you collide, you will not only sustain all the damage of the incoming

blow but also add the full measure of your own force. Like two football linemen

charging forward at the snap of the ball, this is really a worst case scenario. The

winner, if one may use that term, is the player who outweighs and/or out-positions

the other. Either way, it is still crunch time for both.

Try this: Moving into force is best demonstrated in the safety and comfort of

your own home by clapping your hands together very hard. Take note of the

loud noise and sharp stinging sensation in your palms. Both are evidence of force

meeting force with the resulting sound and pain that accompany such an event.

2) Standing Still

Standing in place when being struck is the second worst thing you can do. You
are only slightly better off for no longer adding your own force and momentum to

the impact. In all likelihood, however, your contribution will be compounded by the
natural, fear-induced reaction of freezing up. Although tensing the muscles in
anticipation of being hit affords some protection to internal organs, it also creates a

nice solid, unmoving target for your opponent.

Try this: Having waited until your palms are no longer tingling, clap one hand into

the other, stationary palm. The tingling and pain are back again but not to the

degree evidenced in the first experiment.

3) Moving Away

The best reaction to an oncoming force, in terms of defense of the centerline, is to
move away from it. This means retreating (a) in the same direction as the blow with
enough speed to outdistance it, (b) dodging to the side, or (c) ducking under. It is far
better to attempt to evade a blow, by moving along or obliquely to the opposing lines

of trajectory, than to move in or stand still. A blow that strikes you as you move away

does much less damage than one taken full on.

Try this: Clap one hand into the other as it moves away. Depending on how you
play it, the first either never reaches the opposing hand, or it or strikes it with far

less power or noise. As will become clear in the skill-sets of Nonviolent Self-Defense,
presented in Part Two of this book, evasion is the best reaction to force and always
provides a better outcome.

Movement: Getting Out of the Way

In the art of boxing there is one cardinal rule: Protect yourself at all times.
After all, the whole point of boxing is not to get boxed. Some have suggested that

during a crisis intervention scenario you should adhere to the Hippocratic oath:

First do no harm. As noble as that sentiment is, it is more prudent to first ensure

that you yourself are not harmed. In other words, don't get boxed. If you cannot

keep yourself safe, you will have a difficult time protecting others; this includes

your attacker as well.

The easiest way to keep from getting boxed is to get out of the way.

Therefore, movement is the cornerstone of Nonviolent Self-defense training.

It is much simpler to duck and scramble away than it is to learn more sophisticated

skills such as parrying or blocking an incoming blow. Ducking and scrambling away

rely on instinctive, defensive reflexes our species has been honing for millions of years;

parrying or blocking requires complex motor skills, or learned technique, combined

with speed and timing. The greatest probability of success lies with getting out of

the way.

Try this! Have a friend stand facing you, at arms-length, with his hands at

his side. Ask him to reach out quickly with his right hand and touch your left

shoulder. Try to fend off (parry) his touch with your left hand. You probably

will not be able to intercept his fingers. Why? Because he has the advantage

of moving first from close range; while you, even if you have quick reflexes,

are handicapped by reaction time.

As you can see from the exercise above, standing in close proximity to a
potentially aggressive person is not a good first step in keeping safe. If you

are close enough for a person touch you with a hand or foot, he has penetrated

your threat perimeter. The threat perimeter is a 360 degree defensive zone

around your body defined by the length of your opponent’s longest appendage

(including the length of a weapon he may be wielding). If your opponent is faster

than you are, and you allow him into your perimeter, you will have little chance

of avoiding an incoming blow.

One way of creating a little added space between you and an aggressor is to
remove any target of opportunity. To do this you will need to bend your knees,

relax your hips slightly, and turn the attacked side of your body toward the rear.

This will pull your shoulder away from the incoming blow. In addition, by keeping

leg and hip joints bent and relaxed, and by twisting the axial-skeleton (i.e. hips

through shoulders), you create a pliant and flexible body that is more capable of

absorbing a push or hit.

Now try this! Have your friend attempt to touch your shoulder again. This time,

as you raise your hand up to intercept his touch, simultaneously twist your waist

to move your shoulder away. By combining the deflection and evasive movement

in tandem, you will have greater success avoiding his touch. Even if your parry

still cannot connect with his 'rattlesnake-quick' fingers, at least you will be retreating

from the force and can absorb most of the incoming energy.

Projecting a Layered Defense

A core strategy of Nonviolent Self-Defense, and one we will come back to again

and again in Part Two of this book, is the concept of a projecting a layered defense.

A layered defense means combining two to three counter measures to deal with

one threat. This is often referred to as the klutz factor. Simply put, it is fairly easy

to klutz things up if you rely on only one defensive technique to protect yourself

during an event as random and spontaneous as a physical assault.

No matter how knowledgeable or well trained you may be, if something can go

wrong in encounter, it probably will. It is better to provide some backup of your own.
Projecting a layered defense, metaphorically speaking, is like placing several barriers

between you and a speeding vehicle that is careening out of control and heading your

way. These layers include: defensive posturing; pliancy; evasive movement; and

maintaining distance. Any one of these layers might be sufficient on its own to keep

you safe. Applied in concert, however, they wrap you in protective layers like a

security system with built in redundancies.

In the last demonstration, above, you countered your opponent's attempt

to touch your shoulder with force deflection (the parry) followed by evasive

movement (twisting the upper torso away). If the first did not stop the attack,

the second would probably mitigate any damage. Creating and maintaining

distance can add a third layer of defense to this scenario. You can increase the

space between you and your opponent by taking a step to the rear. Stepping or

shuffling back along the same line of trajectory as the blow will place you in a more

protected position by increasing the radius of your threat perimeter.

Finally Try This! If you are still having trouble evading your partner's touch,

take one step back so he cannot reach you. If he cannot reach you, he cannot

touch you! Now you have three defensive counters that may be performed nearly

simultaneously in one seamless sequence:

1) Raise the left hand up to parry your partner's incoming right. (deflection)

2) Twist the waist leftward to pull the shoulder away. (evasion)

3) Step to the rear with the left leg by pivoting on the right foot. (creating distance)

The Protective Profile

You may add a final layer of defense by raising your forward hand up to face
level in preparation of warding off a second blow. You are now standing in

what is called the protective profile. Both hands are raised in front of the face,

with elbows guarding the chest, and the body is aligned at a forty-five degree

angle to the opponent. The centerline is now well protected from a frontal attack.

This looks very much like a classic boxing stance; however, the hands remain open

and relaxed with palms facing obliquely forward.

The protective profile is a well-covered defensive position that affords your
opponent few openings to attack the centerline, and, yet, it gives off few

aggressive signals that might escalate the encounter. You survived the opening

salvo by remaining aware, relaxed, and mobile. You can now attempt to verbally

de-escalate the incident from a position of strength.

FAQ on Nonviolent Self-Defense

2007-08-24T08:32:00.000-07:00

What is Nonviolent Self-Defense?

NonViolent SelfDefense (NSD) represents a new paradigm in personal protection. NSD is a self-defense system that has no offensive movements and seeks to do as little harm as possible to an opponent. NSD is not spiritual in nature, has no sporting aspects, and is non-competitive. Nonviolent Self-Defense is truly a counter-cultural approach to the problem of interpersonal violence.

NSD has often been characterized as the "Un-martial Art" because it deals with interpersonal violence from the perspective of appropriate response and modulated physical intervention. NSD embraces all the crucial defensive mechanisms found in a "soft" self-defense art while employing non-abusive and non-invasive physical intervention techniques to control and subdue an attacker.

Nonviolent Self-Defense, however, is more that just a collection random techniques or "tricks" borrowed from existing martial systems. NSD is a comprehensive physical-defense system composed of integrated core skills based on natural instinctive movement, whole-body power, and pliancy. NSD employs the skills of evasion, escape, soft engagement, control, and restraint—and not the violent counter-attacks found in corporal self-defense programs.

How Was Nonviolent Self-Defense Developed?

Nonviolent Self-Defense was developed over thirty years ago by Dr. William Paul, a Harvard-trained educational psychologist. Dr. Paul was an international Judo champion, and 5th degree black belt, who wrote his doctoral dissertation on "Nonverbal Communication in Asian Martial Arts." His years of research in mental health institutions in New England led him to the conclusion there was a strong need for a new method of physical crisis intervention that was less harmful to staff and patients. Over time, Dr. Paul developed a comprehensive program of protection and control techniques, integrated with core skills derived from natural movement, that has become Nonviolent Self-Defense.

How is NSD Taught Today?

Although originally developed for use in mental health settings, Nonviolent Self-Defense has evolved into a complete, stand-alone system of self-protection. For many years now, NSD has been taught to professionals in the fields of Education, Social Services, Mental Health, Law Enforcement, and Business. NSD has also proved ideal for women's self-defense programs and as an effective counter-measure for teenagers concerned with bullying and the ever-increasing violence in our schools.

Can I Learn Nonviolent Self-Defense?

Anyone between sixteen and sixty, and in reasonably good health, can learn Nonviolent Self-Defense. Because NSD is based on re-training natural and instinctive movement, rather than being technique-driven, muscle memory (or adaptive response) is an essential component of long-term retention of the core skills. Therefore, partner exercises and group drills dominate the curriculum. NSD classes can be as physically demanding as a good aerobics course.

How is Nonviolent Self-Defense Taught?

NonViolent SelfDefense is taught in seminar, workshop, or long-term, on-going training formats. Instruction is hands on much like learning any martial art or in-depth self-defense program. In a seminar format, lecture and theoretical components are delivered at the beginning of each morning and afternoon session. A training manual and DVD are made available to all students. Successful participants are awarded a certificate of completion at the end of the training.

Nonviolent Self-Defense

2007-08-23T21:21:00.001-07:00

by Douglas Phillips, Ph.D. (Nonviolent Self-Defense Co-Developer)

Attempting to reconcile such opposing concepts as self-defense and nonviolence may be viewed by some as an exercise in futility. However, this is what we attempt to do here in the most concrete way possible. While acknowledging both the limitations and strengths of a rigorously nonviolent approach, we propose that it is possible to effectively apply humane principles to both physical crisis intervention and personal protection.

What we present here is a fully integrated system for training in the practical application of nonviolent principles as they apply to the context of interpersonal violence. This is not merely a course in self-defense. It is rather a form of personal training offering a variety of sophisticated methods that teach essential skills of nonviolent defense and physical control that are both safe and practical.

This system is an attempt to respond to what has become a national health crisis of epidemic proportions. Interpersonal violence, once isolated to the back alleyways and fringes of society, now affects virtually every aspect of our lives. It impacts not only the safety of our schools, homes, and businesses, but also drives up the cost of health care. This endemic violence infects all parts of our economic and social well being and places increasing demands on our mental health, human service, and law enforcement professionals who must respond to it on a daily basis. There is an ever-increasing need for intervention skills that are adaptive in a wide array of crisis and emergency situations, and yet are relatively easy to learn and apply.

The methods taught herein are highly functional, but learning these skills and attitudes requires significant training and dedication. Basic core skills must be practiced in a variety of spontaneous training situations over a long period of time before the student will be able to cope with the random and highly unpredictable nature of interpersonal violence and aggression. This approach to nonviolent intervention requires great skill, activity, and presence on the part of the defender.

It is also important to note that this system has its limitations. Learning this or any other method of physical intervention that purports to be relatively nonviolent simply provides a margin of advantage or safety—not a magical umbrella of protection. We do not propose that these skills, even performed at a high level of competence, can somehow provide total immunity to violent attack. However, if these methods are practiced and applied assiduously, the probability of a safe and successful outcome will be increased significantly.